Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29074815›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2018

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the Treatment of Ischemic Lower- Extremity Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes: Results of the DAMO

Katrien T B Santema, Robert M Stoekenbroek, Mark J W Koelemay, Jim A Reekers, Laura M C van Dortmont, Arno Oomen, Luuk Smeets, Jan J Wever, Dink A Legemate, Dirk T Ubbink and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonischemic diabetic ulcers: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Current Use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katrien T B SantemaDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3388-248X
Robert M StoekenbroekDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark J W KoelemayDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jim A ReekersDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura M C van DortmontDepartment of Surgery, Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, the Netherlands.
Arno OomenDepartment of Surgery, St. Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands.
Luuk SmeetsDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Jan J WeverDepartment of Surgery, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Dink A LegemateDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dirk T UbbinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands d.ubbink@amc.nl.
DAMO2CLES Study Group
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLFranciscus Vlietland · NLHaga Hospital · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSt. Anna Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConflicting evidence exists on the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of chronic ischemic leg ulcers. The aim of this trial was to investigate whether additional HBOT would benefit patients with diabetes and ischemic leg ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsPatients with diabetes with an ischemic wound (

resultsBoth groups contained 60 patients. Limb salvage was achieved in 47 patients in the SC group vs. 53 patients in the SC+HBOT group (risk difference [RD] 10% [95% CI -4 to 23]). After 12 months, 28 index wounds were healed in the SC group vs. 30 in the SC+HBOT group (RD 3% [95% CI -14 to 21]). AFS was achieved in 41 patients in the SC group and 49 patients in the SC+HBOT group (RD 13% [95% CI -2 to 28]). In the SC+HBOT group, 21 patients (35%) were unable to complete the HBOT protocol as planned. Those who did had significantly fewer major amputations and higher AFS (RD for AFS 26% [95% CI 10-38]).

conclusionsAdditional HBOT did not significantly improve complete wound healing or limb salvage in patients with diabetes and lower-limb ischemia.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationLimb SalvageWound HealingAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIschemiaMaleMiddle AgedSample SizeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29074815
OpenAlexW2765204585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.