Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29074563›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Pregnancy, thrombophilia, and the risk of a first venous thrombosis: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis.

F Nanne Croles, Kazem Nasserinejad, Johannes J Duvekot, Marieke Jha Kruip, Karina Meijer, Frank Wg Leebeek

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F Nanne CrolesDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands f.croles@erasmusmc.nl.
Kazem NasserinejadDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Johannes J DuvekotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marieke Jha KruipDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Karina MeijerDepartment of Haematology, University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Frank Wg LeebeekDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Thrombolytic TherapyBayes TheoremEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicRisk FactorsThrombophiliaVenous Thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID29074563
PMCPMC5657463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.