ReviewCirculation research2017
Identity Crisis for Regenerative Cardiac cKit
Review in Circulation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Remodeling and Repair: Recent Approaches, Advancements, and Future Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Targeted delivery of therapeutic agents to the heart.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Mechanism-Based Cardiac Regeneration Strategies in Mammals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transcription Factors in Cardiovascular Pathology.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Young at Heart: Combining Strategies to Rejuvenate Endogenous Mechanisms of Cardiac Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- van Berlo et al. reply.Nature · 2018Article
- Molecular basis of functional myogenic specification of Bona Fide multipotent adult cardiac stem cells.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.