Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29074260›Full record

ArticleComparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP2018

Rattling the border wall: Pathophysiological implications of functional and proteomic venom variation between Mexican and US subspecies of the desert rattlesnake Crotalus scutulatus.

James Dobson, Daryl C Yang, Bianca Op den Brouw, Chip Cochran, Tam Huynh, Sanjaya Kurrupu, Elda E Sánchez, Daniel J Massey, Kate Baumann, Timothy N W Jackson and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tiny but Mighty:Toxins · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional Mining of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

James DobsonVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Daryl C YangDepartment of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Bianca Op den BrouwVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Chip CochranDepartment of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.
Tam HuynhDepartment of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Sanjaya KurrupuDepartment of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Elda E SánchezNational Natural Toxins Research Center (NNTRC), Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, MSC 224, 975 West Avenue B, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA.
Daniel J MasseyArizona Poison and Drug Information Center, 1295 N Martin Room B308, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Banner University Medical Center, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85745, USA.
Kate BaumannVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Timothy N W JacksonVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Amanda NouwensSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Peter JoshSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Edgar Neri-CastroInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad # 2001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.
Alejandro AlagónInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad # 2001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.
Wayne C HodgsonDepartment of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Bryan G FryVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. Electronic address: bgfry@uq.edu.au.
University of Queensland · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUMonash University · AUUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · USLoma Linda University · USTexas A&M University – Kingsville · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Viper Resource Grant at Texas A&M University-KingsvilleP40OD010960 · OD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE · PI Elda E. Sanchez · 2012 to 2026
$9.2M
NIH HHS P40 OD010960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some US populations of the Mohave rattlesnake (Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus) are infamous for being potently neurotoxic, the Mexican subspecies C. s. salvini (Huamantlan rattlesnake) has been largely unstudied beyond crude lethality testing upon mice. In this study we show that at least some populations of this snake are as potently neurotoxic as its northern cousin. Testing of the Mexican antivenom Antivipmyn showed a complete lack of neutralisation for the neurotoxic effects of C. s. salvini venom, while the neurotoxic effects of the US subspecies C. s. scutulatus were time-delayed but ultimately not eliminated. These results document unrecognised potent neurological effects of a Mexican snake and highlight the medical importance of this subspecies, a finding augmented by the ineffectiveness of the Antivipmyn antivenom. These results also influence our understanding of the venom evolution of Crotalus scutulatus, suggesting that neurotoxicity is the ancestral feature of this species, with the US populations which lack neurotoxicity being derived states.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsAntiveninsArizonaChickensCrotalid VenomsCrotalusDesert ClimateFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesLethal Dose 50MaleMexicoMice, Inbred BALB CMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalAntiveninsCrotalid VenomsNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsNeurotoxinsPhospholipases A2Reptilian Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29074260
PMCPMC5825281
OpenAlexW2767028951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.