Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29074169›Full record

ArticlePapillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2016

Monitoring the impact of HPV vaccine in males-Considerations and challenges.

Julia M L Brotherton, Anna R Giuliano, Lauri E Markowitz, Eileen F Dunne, Gina S Ogilvie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia M L BrothertonNational HPV Vaccination Program Register, VCS Inc., PO Box 310, East Melbourne, Victoria 8002, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: jbrother@vcs.org.au.
Anna R GiulianoCentre for Infection Research in Cancer, Moffit Cancer Centre, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Lauri E MarkowitzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E-02, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Eileen F DunneBehavioral & Clinical Research Section, HIV/STD Research Program Thailand MOPH - U.S. CDC Collaboration, DDC 7 Building, 4th Floor Ministry of Public Health, Soi 4 Tivanon Rd., Nonthaburi 11000 Thailand.
Gina S OgilvieUniversity of British Columbia and BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 3N1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Public Health · THMoffitt Cancer Center · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we examine the issues involved if national or sub-national programs are considering extending post HPV vaccine introduction monitoring to include males. Vaccination programs are now being extended to include males in some countries, in order to improve population level HPV infection control and to directly prevent HPV-related disease in males such as anogenital warts and anal cancers. Coverage and adverse events surveillance are essential components of post-vaccination monitoring. Monitoring the impact of vaccination on HPV infection and disease in men raises some similar challenges to monitoring in females, such as the long time frame until cancer outcomes, and also different ones given that genital specimens suitable for monitoring HPV prevalence are not routinely collected for other diagnostic or screening purposes in males. Thus, dedicated surveillance strategies must be designed; the framework of these may be country-specific, dependent upon the male population that is offered vaccination, the health care infrastructure and existing models of disease surveillance such as STI networks. The primary objective of any male HPV surveillance program will be to document changes in the prevalence of HPV infection and disease due to vaccine targeted HPV types occurring post vaccination. The full spectrum of outcomes to be considered for inclusion in any surveillance plan includes HPV prevalence monitoring, anogenital warts, potentially pre-cancerous lesions such as anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), and cancers. Ideally, a combination of short term and long term outcome measures would be included. Surveillance over time in specific targeted populations of men who have sex with men and HIV-infected men (populations at high risk for HPV infection and associated disease) could be an efficient use of resources to demonstrate impact.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellEpidemiological MonitoringHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPenile NeoplasmsPrevalenceYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesDisease surveillanceHuman papillomavirusMalesVaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID29074169
PMCPMC5886861
OpenAlexW2402131068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.