ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2017
Status of Early-Career Academic Cardiology: A Global Perspective.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Protected time" for clinical investigators in medical oncology: The persistent gap between expectation and reality.Cancer · 2026Article
- Setting Yourself up for Success as an Early Career Investigator in Clinical Trials.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- [Challenges and potential of geriatric research in Germany-Insights from the GERisearch survey].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Factors of engagement in research after graduation from EP fellowship: An HRS survey.Heart rhythm · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities for early career medical professionals in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging: a white paper from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Review
- Editorial: Rising stars in cardiac rhythmology: 2023.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict mortality risk in patients with ischemic heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Editorial: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine: Rising Stars 2021.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Starting a Research Career in Cardiology: Advice for Fellows in Training and Early-Career Cardiologists.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the academic achievements of clinician health services research scientists involved in "pre-K" career development award programs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Landscape of Mentorship and its Effects on Success in Cardiology.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Heart Failure Trials Associated With Under-Representation of Women as Lead Authors.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Perception of barriers to research among internal medicine physician hospitalists by career stage.Hospital practice (1995) · 2020Article
- 'See one, do one, teach one': finding your mentor in academic medicine.Future science OA · 2019Article
- Integrating basic science in academic cardiology training: two international perspectives on a common challenge.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important component of the future of cardiovascular care, face myriad challenges. The Early Career Section Academic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, assessed the progress of this cohort from 2013 to 2016 with a global perspective. Data consisted of accessing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute public information, data from the American Heart Association and international organizations, and a membership-wide survey. Although the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute increased funding of career development grants, only a small number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the entire cohort has decreased. Personal motivation, institutional support, and collaborators continued to be positive influential factors. Surprisingly, mentoring ceased to correlate positively with obtaining external grants. The totality of findings suggests that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the authors recommend a set of attainable solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.