Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29073644›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2017

Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history.

Edvard I Moser, May-Britt Moser, Bruce L McNaughton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Survey of the intersection of mental maps and visualization.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hippocampal conditioning code dominates and disrupts the place code.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edvard I MoserKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
May-Britt MoserKavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bruce L McNaughtonCenter for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California at Irvine, Irvine California, USA, and the Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first place cell was recorded and the cognitive-map theory was subsequently formulated, investigation of spatial representation in the hippocampal formation has evolved in stages. Early studies sought to verify the spatial nature of place cell activity and determine its sensory origin. A new epoch started with the discovery of head direction cells and the realization of the importance of angular and linear movement-integration in generating spatial maps. A third epoch began when investigators turned their attention to the entorhinal cortex, which led to the discovery of grid cells and border cells. This review will show how ideas about integration of self-motion cues have shaped our understanding of spatial representation in hippocampal-entorhinal systems from the 1970s until today. It is now possible to investigate how specialized cell types of these systems work together, and spatial mapping may become one of the first cognitive functions to be understood in mechanistic detail.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrain MappingGrid CellsHippocampusHumansPhotic StimulationSpace Perception

Identifiers

PMID29073644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.