Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2018
Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Twenty-Four-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Phase IIb Study.
Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 128 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIb, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multidose, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Proteomics Combined With Metabolomics Studies on the Efficacy of Telitacicept in Chinese Patients of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Who cites it
128 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics and targeted small-molecule therapies plus stable background therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of telitacicept and belimumab on systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Model-based meta-analysis using latent variable modeling to set benchmarks for new treatments of systemic lupus erythematosus.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- The Roles of TNF Signaling Pathways in Metabolism of Bone Tumors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- A Comprehensive Review of Biological Agents for Lupus: Beyond Single Target.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Atacicept in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Telitacicept in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Trial
- B cell-activating factor modulates the factor VIII immune response in hemophilia A.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Trial
- Attainment of treat-to-target endpoints in SLE patients with high disease activity in the atacicept phase 2b ADDRESS II study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Trial
- Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Atacicept in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Caucasian and Japanese Subjects.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2020Trial
- Disease modification in lupus nephritis: towards a pathophysiology-based treatment paradigm.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Selective ablation of dsDNA-specific plasma cells improves lupus nephritis in NZB/W mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Review
- BAFF and APRIL Receptors in B Cell Immunity and Autoimmunity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Management of systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome during CAR-T therapy: insights from two clinical cases.Immuno-oncology technology · 2026Article
- Dual BAFF and APRIL inhibition with TACI-Fc depletes IgA plasma cells and ameliorates lupus nephritis.iScience · 2026Article
- Recent Advancements in the Therapeutic Landscape of IgA Nephropathy and the Impact of Dual Blockers: Telitacicept.Kidney medicine · 2026Review
- B Cell Subsets and Atherosclerosis: Updates and Emerging Concepts.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of atacicept, an antagonist of B lymphocyte stimulator/APRIL-mediated B cell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
methodsADDRESS II is a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase IIb study evaluating the safety and efficacy of atacicept in patients with SLE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01972568). Patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE receiving standard therapy were randomized (1:1:1) to receive atacicept (75 mg or 150 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the SLE responder index 4 (SRI-4) at week 24.
resultsThe intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 306 patients. There was a trend toward an improved SRI-4 response rate with atacicept 75 mg (57.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.78, P = 0.045) and 150 mg (53.8%; adjusted OR 1.56, P = 0.121) at week 24 as compared with placebo (44.0%) (primary analysis; using the screening visit as baseline). In a prespecified sensitivity analysis using study day 1 as baseline, a significantly larger proportion of patients receiving atacicept 75 mg and 150 mg achieved an SRI-4 response at week 24 compared with placebo. In predefined subpopulations with high levels of disease activity (HDA) at baseline, serologically active disease, or both, statistically significant improvements in the SRI-4 and SRI-6 response rates were seen with atacicept versus placebo. A severe risk of disease flare was reduced with atacicept therapy in both the ITT and the HDA populations. The risks of serious adverse events and serious or severe infection were not increased with atacicept as compared with placebo.
conclusionAtacicept treatment showed evidence of efficacy in SLE, particularly in HDA and serologically active patients. Reductions in disease activity and severe flare were observed with atacicept treatment, with an acceptable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.