Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29073279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Open source machine-learning algorithms for the prediction of optimal cancer drug therapies.

Cai Huang, Roman Mezencev, John F McDonald, Fredrik Vannberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Predicting Anticancer Drug Resistance Mediated by Mutations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dissecting the Genome for Drug Response Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  20. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.Artificial intelligence review · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cai HuangSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Roman MezencevSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
John F McDonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Fredrik VannbergSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine is a rapidly growing area of modern medical science and open source machine-learning codes promise to be a critical component for the successful development of standardized and automated analysis of patient data. One important goal of precision cancer medicine is the accurate prediction of optimal drug therapies from the genomic profiles of individual patient tumors. We introduce here an open source software platform that employs a highly versatile support vector machine (SVM) algorithm combined with a standard recursive feature elimination (RFE) approach to predict personalized drug responses from gene expression profiles. Drug specific models were built using gene expression and drug response data from the National Cancer Institute panel of 60 human cancer cell lines (NCI-60). The models are highly accurate in predicting the drug responsiveness of a variety of cancer cell lines including those comprising the recent NCI-DREAM Challenge. We demonstrate that predictive accuracy is optimized when the learning dataset utilizes all probe-set expression values from a diversity of cancer cell types without pre-filtering for genes generally considered to be "drivers" of cancer onset/progression. Application of our models to publically available ovarian cancer (OC) patient gene expression datasets generated predictions consistent with observed responses previously reported in the literature. By making our algorithm "open source", we hope to facilitate its testing in a variety of cancer types and contexts leading to community-driven improvements and refinements in subsequent applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorGene ExpressionHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29073279
PMCPMC5658085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.