Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29073240›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The course of the radial nerve in the distal humerus: A novel, anatomy based, radiographic assessment.

H P Theeuwes, B van der Ende, J W Potters, A J Kerver, J H J M Bessems, G-J Kleinrensink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of plate location on radial nerve palsy recovery time associated with humeral shaft fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute compressive radial neuropathy and wrist drop due to the repetitive overuse of the arm.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H P TheeuwesDepartment of Neuroscience-Anatomy and Erasmus MC Anatomy Research Project (EARP), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-3539
B van der EndeDepartment of Neuroscience-Anatomy and Erasmus MC Anatomy Research Project (EARP), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J W PottersDepartment of Neuroscience-Anatomy and Erasmus MC Anatomy Research Project (EARP), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A J KerverDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J H J M BessemsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G-J KleinrensinkDepartment of Neuroscience-Anatomy and Erasmus MC Anatomy Research Project (EARP), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

METHODS AND

findingsMeasurements were done on both arms of ten specially embalmed specimens. Arms were dissected and radiopaque wires attached to the radial nerve in the distal part of the upper arm. Digital radiographs were obtained to determine the course of the radial nerve in the distal 20 cm of the humerus in relation to bony landmarks; medial epicondyle and capitellum-trochlea projection (CCT). Analysis was done with ImageJ and Microsoft Excel software. We also compared humeral nail specifications from different companies with the course of the radial nerve to predict possible radial nerve damage.

resultsThe distance from the medial epicondyle to point where the radial nerve bends from posterior to lateral was 142 mm on AP radiographs and 152 mm measured on the lateral radiographs. The average distance from the medial epicondyle to point where the radial nerve bends from lateral to anterior on AP radiographs was 66 mm. On the lateral radiographs where the nerve moves away from the anterior cortex 83 mm to the center of capitellum and trochlea (CCT). The distance from the bifurcation of the radial nerve into the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and superficial radial nerve was 21 mm on AP radiographs and 42 mm on the lateral radiographs (CCT).

conclusionsThe course of the radial nerve in the distal part of the upper arm has great variety. Lateral fixation is relatively safe in a zone between the center of capitellum-trochlea and 48 mm proximal to this point. The danger zone in lateral fixation is in-between 48-122 mm proximal from CCT. In anteroposterior direction; distal fixation is dangerous between 21-101 mm measured from the medial epicondyle. The more distal, the more medial the nerve courses making it more valuable to iatrogenic damage. The IMN we compared with our data all show potential risk in case of (blind) distal locking, especially from lateral to medial direction.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansHumerusMaleMiddle AgedRadial NerveSoftware

Identifiers

PMID29073240
PMCPMC5658097
OpenAlexW2765621564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.