ArticlePloS one2017
Questionnaire survey of the pan-African trade in lion body parts.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of the impact of restrictive wildlife trade measures on conservation of iconic species in southern Africa.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Pooled it
- Taking Stock: Assessing Animal Welfare in South African Captive Lion Tourism Venues.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Combining detection dogs with air extraction methodology to expose wildlife trafficking in containerized cargo.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Cultural and ethnopharmacological uses of wildlife in the himalayan region of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
- Reviewing Evidence for the Impact of Lion Farming in South Africa on African Wild Lion Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Fading Roars? A Survey of the Cultural Use and Illegal Trade in Wild Felid Body Parts in Côte d'Ivoire.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Unsustainable anthropogenic mortality threatens the long-term viability of lion populations in Mozambique.PloS one · 2025Article
- Pan-African review of cultural uses of carnivores.PloS one · 2025Review
- Turning the tide on big cat trade: Expert opinion on trends and conservation lessons from the Republic of Korea.PloS one · 2024Article
- Contemporary Cultural Trade of Lion Body Parts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Trading Animal Lives: Ten Tricky Issues on the Road to Protecting Commodified Wild Animals.Bioscience · 2021Article
- Ending Commercial Lion Farming in South Africa: A Gap Analysis Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- The Ethics of Human⁻Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Born captive: A survey of the lion breeding, keeping and hunting industries in South Africa.PloS one · 2019Article
- More than $1 billion needed annually to secure Africa's protected areas with lions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Improving the role of global conservation treaties in addressing contemporary threats to lions.Biodiversity and conservation · 2018Article
- A roaring trade? The legal trade in Panthera leo bones from Africa to East-Southeast Asia.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The African lion is in decline across its range, and consumptive utilisation and trade of their body parts and skins has been postulated as a cause for concern. We undertook a pan-African questionnaire and literature survey to document informed opinion and evidence for the occurrence of domestic and international trade and consumption in African lion body parts across current and former range states. Sixty-five people from 18 countries participated in the online questionnaire survey (run from July 2014 to May 2015), with information provided for 28 countries (including 20 out of 24 countries believed to have extant populations). Respondents were experts within their professional spheres, and 77% had ≥6 years relevant experience within lion conservation or allied wildlife matters. Their opinions revealed wide sub-regional differences in consumptive use, drivers of trade, and access to lions that impact wild lion populations in different ways. Traditional medicine practices (African and Asian) were perceived to be the main uses to which lion body parts and bones are put domestically and traded internationally, and there is reason for concern about persistent imports from former lion range states (mainly in West Africa) for parts for this purpose. The domestic, rather than international, trade in lion body parts was perceived to be a bigger threat to wild lion populations. Parts such as skin, claws, teeth and bones are thought to be in most demand across the continent. The impact of international trade on wild populations was acknowledged to be largely unknown, but occasionally was judged to be 'high', and therefore vigilance is needed to monitor emerging detrimental impacts. Seventeen countries were nominated as priorities for immediate monitoring, including: South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Zambia, Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Cameroon. Reasons for their selection include: prevalence of trophy hunting, 'hot spots' for poaching, active domestic trade in lion body parts, trade in curios for the tourist market, and histories of legal-illegal wildlife trade. This survey, and increased incident reports since mid-2015 of lion poisoning and poaching in Mozambique, Zimbabwe and South Africa, and sporadic poaching events in Uganda and Tanzania, are signalling an escalating trend in the trade of lion products that is an increasing threat to some national populations. The evidence is sufficient to make more detailed investigation of this trade a conservation priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.