Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29073192›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Lipid lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: Which matters in the real world? Statin intensity or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level? ‒ Data from a multicenter registry cohort study in Taiwan.

Yen-Ting Yeh, Wei-Hsian Yin, Wei-Kung Tseng, Fang-Ju Lin, Hung-I Yeh, Jaw-Wen Chen, Yen-Wen Wu, Chau-Chung Wu, Taiwanese Secondary Prevention for Patients with AtheRosCLErotic Disease (T-SPARCLE) Registry Investigators

Open access · goldFull text readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Lipid-lowering prescription patterns after a non-fatal acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yen-Ting YehCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Medical Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Wei-Hsian YinNational Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Kung TsengDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Fang-Ju LinGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-I YehMackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jaw-Wen ChenDepartment of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Wen WuCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Medical Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-8395
Chau-Chung WuCardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwanese Secondary Prevention for Patients with AtheRosCLErotic Disease (T-SPARCLE) Registry Investigators
National Taiwan University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWE-Da Hospital · TWFar Eastern Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhether a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal is essential in secondary prevention is still being debated. The aim of our study was to investigate whether achieving particular LDL-C level goals is associated with the reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) on statin therapy. METHODS AND

resultsFrom January 2010 to August 2014, a total of 4099 patients with ASCVD in the Taiwan Secondary Prevention for patients with AtheRosCLErotic disease (T-SPARCLE) registry were analyzed. The risk of a MACE was lower in patients with LDL-C level under control at < 100 mg/dL by statins than in patients with LDL-C level ≥100 mg/dL whether on statin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04‒2.63, p = 0.03) or not (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.06‒3.94, p = 0.03). In multivariate Cox model analyses, statin intensity had no significant predictive value, and LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL was associated with a slight but not significant trend toward increased risk of MACEs (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96‒2.07, p = 0.08).

conclusionsFor patients with ASCVD on statin therapy guided by a target-driven strategy, failure to control LDL-C levels to < 100 mg/dL was associated with higher risk of MACEs. Statin intensity alone had no significant impact on the risk of MACEs after multivariate adjustment.

Indexed as

AgedAtherosclerosisCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTaiwanCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29073192
PMCPMC5658082
OpenAlexW2765280011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.