Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29072793›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2019

Cytoarchitectonically-driven MRI atlas of nonhuman primate hippocampus: Preservation of subfield volumes in aging.

Colin T Kyle, Jared Stokes, Jeffrey Bennett, Jeri Meltzer, Michele R Permenter, Julie A Vogt, Arne Ekstrom, Carol A Barnes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral Impact of Long-Term Chronic Implantation of Neural Recording Devices in the Rhesus Macaque.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Colin T KyleEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Jared StokesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA.
Jeffrey BennettDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and M.I.N.D. Institute, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Jeri MeltzerCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Michele R PermenterCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Julie A VogtCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Arne EkstromDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA.
Carol A BarnesEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.ORCID 0000-0001-8122-9007
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
ZONA PELLUCIDA PEPTIDES AS IMMUNOCONTRACEPTIVE ANTIGENSP51RR000169 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HYDE, DALLAS MELVIN · 1985 to 2011
$126.2M
NEUROBEHAVIORAL RELATIONS IN SENESCENT HIPPOCAMPUSR01AG003376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 1985 to 2025
$16.4M
Representation of spatiotemporal information in human episodic memory and navigationR01NS076856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARNE D EKSTROM · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research FoundationNCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000169NIA NIH HHS R01 AG003376NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIH HHS P51 RR000169NIH HHS R01 AG003376NIH HHS R01 NS076856NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of primate hippocampal subfields in vivo using structural MRI imaging relies on variable anatomical guidelines, signal intensity differences, and heuristics to differentiate between regions (Yushkevich et al., 2015a). Thus, a clear anatomically-driven basis for subfield demarcation is lacking. Recent work, however, has begun to develop methods to use ex vivo histology or ex vivo MRI (Adler et al., 2014; Iglesias et al., 2015) that have the potential to inform subfield demarcations of in vivo images. For optimal results, however, ex vivo and in vivo images should ideally be matched within the same healthy brains, with the goal to develop a neuroanatomically-driven basis for in vivo structural MRI images. Here, we address this issue in young and aging rhesus macaques (young n = 5 and old n = 5) using ex vivo Nissl-stained sections in which we identified the dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, subiculum, presubiculum, and parasubiculum guided by morphological cell properties (30 μm thick sections spaced at 240 μm intervals and imaged at 161 nm/pixel). The histologically identified boundaries were merged with in vivo structural MRIs (0.625 × 0.625 × 1 mm) from the same subjects via iterative rigid and diffeomorphic registration resulting in probabilistic atlases of young and old rhesus macaques. Our results indicate stability in hippocampal subfield volumes over an age range of 13 to 32 years, consistent with previous results showing preserved whole hippocampal volume in aged macaques (Shamy et al., 2006). Together, our methods provide a novel approach for identifying hippocampal subfields in non-human primates and a potential 'ground truth' for more accurate identification of hippocampal subfield boundaries on in vivo MRIs. This could, in turn, have applications in humans where accurately identifying hippocampal subfields in vivo is a critical research goal.

Indexed as

AgingAtlases as TopicAnimalsHippocampusMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance Imagingaginghippocampushistologyin vivoMRIpostmortemreconstructionregistrationsubfields

Identifiers

PMID29072793
PMCPMC5920786
OpenAlexW2766951423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.