Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29072677›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2018

The impact of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode on respiratory severity score and energy expenditure in infants: a randomized crossover trial.

J L Rosterman, E K Pallotto, W E Truog, H Escobar, K A Meinert, A Holmes, H Dai, W M Manimtim

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Perspectives of medical staff on respiratory management with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L RostermanChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
E K PallottoChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
W E TruogChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
H EscobarChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
K A MeinertChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
A HolmesChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
H DaiChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
W M ManimtimChildren's Mercy-Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
University of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExamine respiratory severity scores (RSS) (mean airway pressure × fraction of inspired oxygen) and resting energy expenditure (REE) on neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) compared with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure controlled and supported breath (SIMV (PC)PS). STUDY

designA randomized, crossover trial in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Twenty-four patients were ventilated with NAVA or SIMV (PC) PS for 12 h and then crossed over to the alternative mode for 12 h. The primary outcome (RSS) and additional secondary respiratory outcomes were analyzed.

resultsRSS and measured REE were not different between modes. On NAVA, peak inspiratory pressures were lower (17.8 vs 19.9 cmH

conclusionNAVA mode can be safe without increase in RSS or REE. Although respiratory rates were higher, this was offset by lower peak inspiratory pressures and WOB during NAVA.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesEnergy MetabolismFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalInteractive Ventilatory SupportIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationMaleMissouriOxygenProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID29072677
OpenAlexW2766446686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.