ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
T3 subclassification using the EMD/mesorectum ratio predicts neoadjuvant chemoradiation outcome in T3 rectal cancer patients.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percentage of Tumor Invasion at Pretreatment High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Associating With Aggressive and Tumor Response in Chinese T3 Rectal Cancer-Preliminary Results.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- [Preoperative imaging for colorectal cancer: surgeons' perspective].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of the EMD (extramural depth)/mesorectum ratio as a marker for T3 rectal cancer and its ability to predict tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation and survival.
methodsFrom 2010 to 2016, 284 T3 rectal cancer patients who underwent high resolution MRI before neoadjuvant chemoradiation were enrolled. The EMD was defined as the distance from the outer edge of the muscularis propria to the outermost edge of the tumour. The measurement of the tumour EMD and mesorectum was in the same layer and their ratio was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and relative area under the curve statistics were used to choose the cut-off value. The association of the EMD/mesorectum ratio and other MRI or clinical factors with the tumour regression grade (TRG) was analysed. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate independent risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsThe mean EMD/mesorectum ratio was 0.47 ± 0.3. We chose an EMD/mesorectum ratio of 0.5 in further analyses after receiver operating characteristic analysis. Of 284 patients, 177 (62.3%) had an EMD/mesorectum ratio ≤ 0.5. Patients with an EMD/mesorectum ratio ≤ 0.5 had a higher TRG 0-1 rate than patients with a ratio >0.5 (53.1% vs 36.4%, p = 0.006). A multivariate analysis identified that an EMD/mesorectum ratio >0.5 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.020; p = 0.028] and ypTNM II-III (HR 3.550; p = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors to indicate decreased DFS. For OS, only patients with TRG 2-3 had decreased OS compared with patients with TRG 0-1 (HR 2.959; p = 0.035).
conclusionWhen the EMD/mesorectum ratio was applied to categorize T3 rectal cancer patients, the ratio of 0.5 can be used as a cut-off value for T3 rectal cancer. Patients with a ratio ≤ 0.5 had a higher response rate and better DFS. However, further validation is needed in a larger sample of patients. Advances in knowledge: The EMD/mesorectum ratio may serve to predict tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation and survival in T3 rectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.