ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2017
Evaluation on Efficacy and Safety of Arsenic Trioxide Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization alone for Unresectable Primary Liver Cancer
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Procalcitonin Levels in Post TACE Infection.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Formulation Comprising Arsenic Trioxide and Dimercaprol Enhances Radiosensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, some clinical trials of arsenic trioxide (As203) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer (PLC) had been conducted, but the results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on 14 clinical trials (1076 cases) to evaluate efficacy and safety of As203 plus TACE versus TACE alone for unresectable PLC. The primary end points included objective response rate (ORR), karnofsky performance score (KPS) improvement rate, and 1-year survival rate. The second end points were adverse events consisting of leukopenia, liver dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, myelosuppression and pain. Our study showed that, compared with TACE alone, As203 plus TACE appeared a significant benefit on ORR (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15,1.50, P < 0.0001), KPS improvement rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03,1.48, P = 0.02) and 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15,1.49, P < 0.0001). Additionally, no remarkable difference of adverse events were observed between two arms: leukopenia (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.90,2.32, P = 0.13), liver dysfunction (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76,1.21, P = 0.71), nausea/vomiting (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84,1.44, P = 0.48), fever (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.82,1.61, P = 0.43), myelosuppression (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.74,1.56, P = 0.72) and pain (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.57,1.36, P = 0.57). This study demonstrated that As203 plus TACE produced a favorable efficacy without enhancing adverse events and was a promising combination therapy option for unresectable PLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.