Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29072143›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Detecting large deletions at base pair level by combining split read and paired read data.

Matthew Hayes, Jeremy S Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew HayesXavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Dr, New Orleans, 70125, LA, USA. mhayes5@xula.edu.
Jeremy S PearsonDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd., Nashville, 37221, Tennessee, USA.
Tennessee State University · USXavier University of Louisiana · US

Funding

Xavier's RCMI Cancer Research ProgramG12MD007595 · NIMHD · XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI D'AMOUR, GENE, WANG, GUANGDI · 2012 to 2018
$15.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic structural variants (SV) play a significant role in the onset and progression of cancer. Genomic deletions can create oncogenic fusion genes or cause the loss of tumor suppressing gene function which can lead to tumorigenesis by downregulating these genes. Detecting these variants has clinical importance in the treatment of diseases. Furthermore, it is also clinically important to detect their breakpoint boundaries at high resolution. We have generalized the framework of a previously-published algorithm that located translocations, and we have applied that framework to develop a method to locate deletions at base pair level using next-generation sequencing data. Our method uses abnormally mapped read pairs, and then subsequently maps split reads to identify precise breakpoints.

resultsOn a primary prostate cancer dataset and a simulated dataset, our method predicted the number, type, and breakpoints of biologically validated SVs at high accuracy. It also outperformed two existing algorithms on precise breakpoint prediction, which is clinically important.

conclusionOur algorithm, called Pegasus, accurately calls deletion breakpoints. However, the method must be extended to allow for germline variant filtering and heterozygous deletion detection. The source code that implements Pegasus can be downloaded from the following URL: http://github.com/mhayes20/Pegasus .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase PairingComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsSequence DeletionDeletionsSequencingStructural variant

Identifiers

PMID29072143
PMCPMC5657039
OpenAlexW2765837455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.