ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
An effective approach to detecting both small and large complexes from protein-protein interaction networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal constrained RNA-protein heterogeneous network for protein complex identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- HPC-Atlas: Computationally Constructing A Comprehensive Atlas of Human Protein Complexes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Small protein complex prediction algorithm based on protein-protein interaction network segmentation.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Assessment of a Large-Scale Unbiased Malignant Pleural Effusion Proteomics Study of a Real-Life Cohort.Cancers · 2022Article
- A supervised protein complex prediction method with network representation learning and gene ontology knowledge.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- An Ensemble Learning Framework for Detecting Protein Complexes From PPI Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- PS-MCL: parallel shotgun coarsened Markov clustering of protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Predicting overlapping protein complexes based on core-attachment and a local modularity structure.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- CPredictor3.0: detecting protein complexes from PPI networks with expression data and functional annotations.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting protein complexes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks has been studied for decade. Various methods have been proposed to address some challenging issues of this problem, including overlapping clusters, high false positive/negative rates of PPI data and diverse complex structures. It is well known that most current methods can detect effectively only complexes of size ≥3, which account for only about half of the total existing complexes. Recently, a method was proposed specifically for finding small complexes (size = 2 and 3) from PPI networks. However, up to now there is no effective approach that can predict both small (size ≤ 3) and large (size >3) complexes from PPI networks.
resultsIn this paper, we propose a novel method, called CPredictor2.0, that can detect both small and large complexes under a unified framework. Concretely, we first group proteins of similar functions. Then, the Markov clustering algorithm is employed to discover clusters in each group. Finally, we merge all discovered clusters that overlap with each other to a certain degree, and the merged clusters as well as the remaining clusters constitute the set of detected complexes. Extensive experiments have shown that the new method can more effectively predict both small and large complexes, in comparison with the state-of-the-art methods.
conclusionsThe proposed method, CPredictor2.0, can be applied to accurately predict both small and large protein complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.