Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071492›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2018

Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study.

Anouk J M Cornelissen, Jop Beugels, Sander M J van Kuijk, Esther M Heuts, Shai M Rozen, Aldona J Spiegel, René R W J van der Hulst, Stefania M H Tuinder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diagnosis and Management of Neuropathic Breast Pain.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anouk J M CornelissenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-6552
Jop BeugelsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Esther M HeutsDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Shai M RozenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1801 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Aldona J SpiegelDivision of Plastic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
René R W J van der HulstDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stefania M H TuinderDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.tuinder@mumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe number of breast cancer survivors continues to grow. Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. Impaired sensation remains a debilitating side effect with a significant impact on the quality of life. Microsurgical nerve coaptation of a sensory nerve has the potential to improve sensation of the reconstructed breast. This study investigates the effect of improved sensation of the reconstructed breast on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in the Maastricht University Medical Center. Patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2015 and January 2016 were included. The primary outcome was quality of life (BREAST-Q domain 'physical well-being of the chest'). The Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were used for objective sensation measurement of the reconstructed breast(s).

resultsEighteen patients with and 14 patients without nerve coaptation responded. Nipple reconstruction was the only characteristic that differed statistically significant between both groups (p = 0.04). The BREAST-Q score for the domain physical well-being of the chest was 77.89 ± 18.89 on average in patients with nerve coaptation and 66.21 ± 18.26 in patients without nerve coaptation (p = 0.09). Linear regression showed a statistically significant relation between objectively measured sensation and BREAST-Q score for the domain physical well-being of the chest with a regression coefficient of - 13.17 ± 3.61 (p < 0.01).

conclusionsImproved sensation in the autologous reconstructed breast, with the addition of microsurgical nerve coaptation, has a statistical significant positive impact on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors according to the BREAST-Q.

Indexed as

MammaplastyAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSensationSurgical FlapsBreast reconstructionNerve coaptationNeurotisationQuality of LifeSensation

Identifiers

PMID29071492
PMCPMC5807496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.