Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071457›Full record

ArticleInflammopharmacology2018

Evaluation of cebranopadol, a dually acting nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid receptor agonist in mouse models of acute, tonic, and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.

Kinga Sałat, Anna Furgała, Robert Sałat

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cebranopadol for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Experimental Drugs for Neuropathic Pain.Current neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kinga SałatChair of Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacodynamics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna St, 30-688, Krakow, Poland. salat.kinga@gmail.com.
Anna FurgałaChair of Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacodynamics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna St, 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Robert SałatFaculty of Production Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 164 Nowoursynowska St, 02-787, Warsaw, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2015/17/B/NZ7/02937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCebranopadol (a.k.a. GRT-6005) is a dually acting nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid receptor agonist that has been recently developed in Phase 2 clinical trials for painful diabetic neuropathy or cancer pain. It also showed analgesic properties in various rat models of pain and had a better safety profile as compared to equi-analgesic doses of morphine. Since antinociceptive properties of cebranopadol have been studied mainly in rat models, in the present study, we assessed analgesic activity of subcutaneous cebranopadol (10 mg/kg) in various mouse pain models.

methodsWe used models of acute, tonic, and chronic pain induced by thermal and chemical stimuli, with a particular emphasis on pharmacoresistant chronic neuropathic pain evoked by oxaliplatin in which cebranopadol was used alone or in combination with simvastatin. KEY

resultsAs shown in the hot plate test, the analgesic activity of cebranopadol developed more slowly as compared to morphine (90-120 min vs. 60 min). Cebranopadol displayed a significant antinociceptive activity in acute pain models, i.e., the hot plate, writhing, and capsaicin tests. It attenuated nocifensive responses in both phases of the formalin test and reduced cold allodynia in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain model. Its efficacy was similar to that of morphine. Used in combination and administered simultaneously, 4 or 6 h after simvastatin, cebranopadol did not potentiate antiallodynic activity of this cholesterol-lowering drug. Cebranopadol did not induce any motor deficits in the rotarod test.

conclusionCebranopadol may have significant potential for the treatment of various pain types, including inflammatory and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsChronic PainDisease Models, AnimalIndolesMaleMiceMorphineNeuralgiaNociceptinOpioid PeptidesPain MeasurementReceptors, OpioidSimvastatinSpiro Compounds6'-fluoro-4',9'-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenylspiro(cyclohexane-1,1'(3'H)-pyrano(3,4-b)indol)-4-amineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidIndolesMorphineNociceptinOpioid PeptidesReceptors, OpioidSimvastatinSpiro CompoundsCebranopadolChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyNeurogenic inflammationOxaliplatinPain modelsSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID29071457
PMCPMC5859690
OpenAlexW2766552310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.