ReviewCurrent genetics2018
Exiting prophase I: no clear boundary.
Review in Current genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Argonaute proteins orchestrate Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation and timing of the spermatogenic transcriptional program.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Editorial: Molecular architecture and dynamics of meiotic chromosomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Does the Pachytene Checkpoint, a Feature of Meiosis, Filter Out Mistakes in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair and as a side-Effect Strongly Promote Adaptive Speciation?Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- The Essential Function of SETDB1 in Homologous Chromosome Pairing and Synapsis during Meiosis.Cell reports · 2021Article
- Unresolved Recombination Intermediates Cause aGenetics · 2019Article
- The DNA damage checkpoint and the spindle position checkpoint: guardians of meiotic commitment.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis.Chromosoma · 2019Article
- The meiotic-specific Mek1 kinase in budding yeast regulates interhomolog recombination and coordinates meiotic progression with double-strand break repair.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Single and Double Strand Sperm DNA Damage: Different Reproductive Effects on Male Fertility.Genes · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The meiotic cell cycle provides a unique model to study the relationship between recombinational DNA repair and the cell cycle, since homologous recombination, induced by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), is integrated as an essential step during meiosis. The pachytene checkpoint, which is situated towards the end of meiotic prophase I, coordinates homologous recombination and cell cycle progression, similar to the DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms operating in vegetative cells. However, there are a number of features unique to meiosis, making the system optimized for the purpose of meiosis. Our recent work highlights the involvement of three major cell cycle kinases, Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase, Polo kinase and CDK, in coordinating homologous recombination and the meiotic cell cycle. In this review, we will discuss the unique interplay between meiotic cell cycle control and homologous recombination during meiosis I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.