Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071368›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Birds Mediate a Fungus-Mite Mutualism.

Natalie Theron-De Bruin, Léanne L Dreyer, Eddie A Ueckermann, Michael J Wingfield, Francois Roets

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diversity and sources of floral microbial communities.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Prevalence and diversity of parasitic bird lice (Insecta: Psocodea) in northeast Arkansas.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie Theron-De BruinDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
Léanne L DreyerDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
Eddie A UeckermannSchool of Biological Sciences/Zoology, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.
Michael J WingfieldForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.
Francois RoetsDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa. fr@sun.ac.za.
Stellenbosch University · ZANorth-West University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutualisms between ophiostomatoid fungi and arthropods have been well documented. These fungi commonly aid arthropod nutrition and, in turn, are transported to new niches by these arthropods. The inflorescences of Protea trees provide a niche for a unique assemblage of ophiostomatoid fungi. Here, mites feed on Sporothrix fungi and vector the spores to new niches. Protea-pollinating beetles transport the spore-carrying mites between Protea trees. However, many Protea species are primarily pollinated by birds that potentially play a central role in the Protea-Sporothrix-mite system. To investigate the role of birds in the movement of mites and/or fungal spores, mites were collected from Protea inflorescences and cape sugarbirds, screened for Sporothrix fungal spores and tested for their ability to feed and reproduce on the fungal associates. Two mite species where abundant in both Protea inflorescences and on cape sugarbirds and regularly carried Sporothrix fungal spores. One of these mite species readily fed and reproduced on its transported fungal partner. For dispersal, this mite (a Glycyphagus sp.) attached to a larger mite species (Proctolaelaps vandenbergi) which, in turn, were carried by the birds to new inflorescences. The results of this study provide compelling evidence for a new mite-fungus mutualism, new mite-mite commensalisms and the first evidence of birds transporting mites with Sporothrix fungal spores to colonise new Protea trees.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod VectorsBirdsDNA, FungalFungiMitesProteaceaeSouth AfricaSpores, FungalSymbiosisTreesDNA, FungalAcariMutualismPhoresyPromeropsProteaSporothrix

Identifiers

PMID29071368
OpenAlexW2766508975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.