Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071361›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

The speed-curvature power law of movements: a reappraisal.

Myrka Zago, Adam Matic, Tamar Flash, Alex Gomez-Marin, Francesco Lacquaniti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High mirror symmetry in mouse exploratory behavior.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dynamic Primitives Limit Human Force Regulation during Motion.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Modulation of ellipses drawing by sonification.Experimental brain research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Myrka ZagoLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-7582
Adam MaticBehavior of Organisms Laboratory, Instituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, Av Ramón y Cajal, Alicante, Spain.
Tamar FlashDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Alex Gomez-MarinBehavior of Organisms Laboratory, Instituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, Av Ramón y Cajal, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-2583
Francesco LacquanitiLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy. lacquaniti@med.uniroma2.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-7315

Funding

Agenzia Spaziale Italiana 2014-008-R.0Agenzia Spaziale Italiana I/006/06/0Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad BES-2016-077608Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad BFU-2015-74241-JINMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad SEV-2013-0317Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2015HFWRYY_002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several types of curvilinear movements obey approximately the so called 2/3 power law, according to which the angular speed varies proportionally to the 2/3 power of the curvature. The origin of the law is debated but it is generally thought to depend on physiological mechanisms. However, a recent paper (Marken and Shaffer, Exp Brain Res 88:685-690, 2017) claims that this power law is simply a statistical artifact, being a mathematical consequence of the way speed and curvature are calculated. Here we reject this hypothesis by showing that the speed-curvature power law of biological movements is non-trivial. First, we confirm that the power exponent varies with the shape of human drawing movements and with environmental factors. Second, we report experimental data from Drosophila larvae demonstrating that the power law does not depend on how curvature is calculated. Third, we prove that the law can be violated by means of several mathematical and physical examples. Finally, we discuss biological constraints that may underlie speed-curvature power laws discovered in empirical studies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiomechanical PhenomenaDrosophila melanogasterHumansLarvaMotor ActivityDrawingMotor controlStatistical analysisTwo-thirds power law

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.