Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071301›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Action Monitoring Cortical Activity Coupled to Submovements.

Michael Pereira, Aleksander Sobolewski, José Del R Millán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling Post-Stroke Motor Behavior from Structural Lesion Networks: A Preliminary Study with Robot-Based Assessments.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Midfrontal theta dynamics index the monitoring of postural stability.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Errors and Action Monitoring:Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael PereiraChair in Brain-Machine Interface, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Lausanne, Geneva CH-1202, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0778-674X
Aleksander SobolewskiChair in Brain-Machine Interface, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Lausanne, Geneva CH-1202, Switzerland.
José Del R MillánChair in Brain-Machine Interface, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Lausanne, Geneva CH-1202, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-1522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined neural correlates of the human brain's action-monitoring system during experimentally segmented tasks. However, it remains unknown how such a system operates during continuous motor output when no experimental time marker is available (such as button presses or stimulus onset). We set out to investigate the electrophysiological correlates of action monitoring when hand position has to be repeatedly monitored and corrected. For this, we recorded high-density electroencephalography (EEG) during a visuomotor tracking task during which participants had to follow a target with the mouse cursor along a visible trajectory. By decomposing hand kinematics into naturally occurring periodic submovements, we found an event-related potential (ERP) time-locked to these submovements and localized in a sensorimotor cortical network comprising the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the precentral gyrus. Critically, the amplitude of the ERP correlated with the deviation of the cursor, 110 ms before the submovement. Control analyses showed that this correlation was truly due to the cursor deviation and not to differences in submovement kinematics or to the visual content of the task. The ERP closely resembled those found in response to mismatch events in typical cognitive neuroscience experiments. Our results demonstrate the existence of a cortical process in the SMA, evaluating hand position in synchrony with submovements. These findings suggest a functional role of submovements in a sensorimotor loop of periodic monitoring and correction and generalize previous results from the field of action monitoring to cases where action has to be repeatedly monitored.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultAnalysis of VarianceBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHumansMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultEEGerrorkinematicsmonitoringsubmovementssupplementary motor area

Identifiers

PMID29071301
PMCPMC5654239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.