Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071122›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2017

Diagnostic algorithm, prognostic factors and surgical treatment of metastatic cancer diseases of the long bones and spine.

Miklós Szendrői, Imre Antal, Attila Szendrői, Áron Lazáry, Péter Pál Varga

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Orthopaedic Surgical Selection and Inpatient Paradigms During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic.The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miklós SzendrőiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, H-1082 Budapest, Üllői 78/b, Hungary.
Imre AntalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, H-1082 Budapest, Üllői 78/b, Hungary.
Attila SzendrőiDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, H-1082 Budapest, Üllői 78/b, Hungary.
Áron LazáryNational Center for Spinal Disorders, H-1126 Budapest, Királyhágó u.1., Hungary.
Péter Pál VargaNational Center for Spinal Disorders, H-1126 Budapest, Királyhágó u.1., Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUNational Center for Spinal Disorders · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncological management of skeletal metastases has changed dramatically in the last few decades. A significant number of patients survive for many years with their metastases.Surgeons are more active and the technical repertoire is broader, from plates to intramedullary devices to (tumour) endoprostheses.The philosophy of treatment should be different in the case of a trauma-related fracture and a pathological fracture. A proper algorithm for establishing a diagnosis and evaluation of prognostic factors helps in planning the surgical intervention.The aim of palliative surgery is usually to eliminate pain and to allow the patient to regain his/her mobility as well as to improve the quality of life through minimally invasive techniques using life-long durable devices.In a selected group of patients with an oncologically controlled primary tumour site and a solitary bone metastasis with positive prognostic factors, which meet the criteria for radical excision (approximately 10% to 15% of the cases), a promising three to five years of survival may be achieved, especially in cases of metastases from breast and kidney cancer.Spinal metastases require meticulous evaluation because decisions on treatment mostly depend on the tumour type, segmental stability, the patient's symptoms and general state of health.Advanced radiotherapy combined with minimally invasive surgical techniques (minimally invasive stabilisation and separation surgery) provides durable local control with a low complication rate in a number of patients. Cite this article:

Indexed as

bone metastasesdiagnostic algorithmlong bonesprognostic factorsspinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID29071122
PMCPMC5644421
OpenAlexW2751279641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.