Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071100›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2017

Effectiveness of educational and lifestyle interventions to prevent paediatric obesity: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.

D Gori, F Guaraldi, S Cinocca, G Moser, P Rucci, M P Fantini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Fetal programming of obesity and type 2 diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The effect of Public Health/Pediatric Obesity interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in childhood obesity: A scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D GoriDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM) University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
F GuaraldiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin Turin Italy.
S CinoccaSchool of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
G MoserSchool of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
P RucciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM) University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
M P FantiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM) University of Bologna Bologna Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review and meta-analysis aim at updating a previous meta-analysis carried out by Waters

methodsUsing an

resultsSeventy-two studies were meta-analysed. Overall, the best results were achieved by programmes combining diet and physical activity (

conclusionsInterventions for childhood obesity prevention should include both diet and physical activity, be preferentially targeted towards school age children and involve both the school and family setting. However, because of the important methodological limitations associated with currently available literature, additional studies are needed to draw definite conclusions.

Indexed as

Childhood obesitydieteducational programmesphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID29071100
PMCPMC5649699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.