Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29071075›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2017

Evaluation by various methods of the physiological mechanism of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in healthy volunteers.

Miyuki Okuda, Nobuya Tanaka, Kazuyuki Naito, Takao Kumada, Koji Fukuda, Yuto Kato, Yuto Kido, Yutaro Okuda, Ryuji Nohara

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03615417 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Preoxygenation in Obese Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2018 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsPreoxygenation, Anesthesia, ObesityArmsHigh Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), Standard anesthesia FaceMask (FM)
NCT07528404 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Prevention of Early Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUijeongbu St. Mary HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled580ConditionsPostoperative Complications, Atelectasis, Pneumonia, Respiratory InsufficiencyArmsHigh flow nasal cannula (HFNC), Standard oxygen therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miyuki OkudaFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuya TanakaFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuyuki NaitoIMI Co., Ltd, Koshigaya, Japan.
Takao KumadaChest Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji FukudaFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Yuto KatoFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Yuto KidoFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaro OkudaHyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Ryuji NoharaFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Association Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Municipal Hirakata City Hospital · JPHyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral reports have described the usefulness of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). However, the physiological mechanisms of this system are unclear. In the current study, various methods were used to investigate the physiological mechanisms of an HFNC in healthy volunteers.

methodsThe physiological mechanisms of the constant-flow and constant-pressure models of HFNC were studied in 10 healthy volunteers by the oesophageal balloon method, the electrical impedance method and the forced oscillation technique (FOT).

resultsThe tidal volume (TV) increased markedly during HFNC (off, 30 L/min, 50 L/min: 685.6±236.5 mL, 929.8±434.7 mL, 968.8±451.1 mL). The end-inspiratory oesophageal pressure (EIOP) was not significantly different, but there was a tendency for it to decrease. HFNC 30 L/min and 50 L/min, the increment in TV and the difference in EIOP showed strong negative correlations (p=0.0025, 0.003). The end-expiratory oesophageal pressure (EEOP) increased. The respiratory system reactance at 5 Hz (X5) by FOT decreased significantly. There was a flow rate-dependent EEOP increase, and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect of HFNC was confirmed. There was a correlation between the difference in X5 and the difference in EEOP during HFNC 30 L/min and 50 L/min, with correlation coefficients of 0.534 and 0.404 (p=0.112, 0.281). The amount of change in EEOP and the fluctuation in X5 were positively correlated.

conclusionsThe PEEP effect of HFNC was confirmed by the electrical impedance method and FOT. The increment in TV and the difference in EIOP of HFNC showed strong negative correlations.

Indexed as

ambulatory oxygen therapyassisted ventilationCOPD exacerbationsNon invasive ventilationrespiratory measurement

Identifiers

PMID29071075
PMCPMC5647476
OpenAlexW2736379289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.