Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070990›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2017

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effect of Paclitaxel on Cardiac Ejection Fraction.

Mohammed Osman, Mohammad Elkady

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. NAD in pathological cardiac remodeling: Metabolic regulation and beyond.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. New Concepts in Cardio-Oncology.Cancer treatment and research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed OsmanGeneral Organization for Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammad ElkadyAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EGGeneral Organization For Teaching Hospitals and Institutes · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of the study was to evaluate the long-term changes in ejection fraction (EF) associated with paclitaxel infusion.

methods50 patients were enrolled in this prospective study between 2011 and 2015. The study design included frequent follow-up visits to the clinic, EF evaluation at baseline, and regular EF assessment by echocardiography for 30 months after treatment.

resultsThe median baseline EF was 60% (95% confidence interval (CI) 50-80%). At 30 months, the median EF was 48% (95% CI 40-60%; p = 0.03). During the 30-month follow-up, 10 (20%) patients developed grade 1 and 2 cardiotoxicities; none developed grade 3 or 4 cardiotoxicities. Furthermore, paclitaxel cardiotoxicity increased among patients with high-risk features including associated diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior radiotherapy to the chest wall, performance status of 2, and age > 60 years.

conclusionPaclitaxel has cardiotoxic effects. Careful monitoring of cardiac function during and after paclitaxel infusion is required in patients with high-risk features.

Indexed as

CardiotoxicityCHFEchocardiographyEFPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID29070990
PMCPMC5649227
OpenAlexW2753471325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.