ArticleScientific reports2017
Hydration number: crucial role in nuclear magnetic relaxivity of Gd(III) chelate-based nanoparticles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the in-vitro evaluation of folic acid-modified gadolinium nanoparticles in HEK-293, HeLa, and KB cancer cells for targeted-MR-imaging agent candidate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Temporal changes in sucrose phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: effects of preparation temperatures.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Hydration Behavior of Different Sugars by Time Domain-NMR.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 1,3-Diketone Calix[4]arene Derivatives-A New Type of Versatile Ligands for Metal Complexes and Nanoparticles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Terbium(III)-thiacalix[4]arene nanosensor for highly sensitive intracellular monitoring of temperature changes within the 303-313 K range.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Insulin Hexamer-Caged Gadolinium Ion as MRI Contrast-o-phore.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, nanostructure-based contrast agents (CA) are emerging in the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Their sensitivity is reported as greatly improved in comparison to commercially used chelate-based ones. The present work is aimed at revealing the factors governing the efficiency of longitudinal magnetic relaxivity (r
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.