Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070813›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The impact of ageing reveals distinct roles for human dentate gyrus and CA3 in pattern separation and object recognition memory.

Serena E Dillon, Demitra Tsivos, Michael Knight, Bryony McCann, Catherine Pennington, Anna I Shiel, Myra E Conway, Margaret A Newson, Risto A Kauppinen, Elizabeth J Coulthard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Serena E DillonBristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Demitra TsivosBristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Michael KnightSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
Bryony McCannSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
Catherine PenningtonBristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Anna I ShielDepartment of Applied Science, University of West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Myra E ConwayDepartment of Applied Science, University of West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Margaret A NewsonBristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Risto A KauppinenSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
Elizabeth J CoulthardBristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. elizabeth.coulthard@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both recognition of familiar objects and pattern separation, a process that orthogonalises overlapping events, are critical for effective memory. Evidence is emerging that human pattern separation requires dentate gyrus. Dentate gyrus is intimately connected to CA3 where, in animals, an autoassociative network enables recall of complete memories to underpin object/event recognition. Despite huge motivation to treat age-related human memory disorders, interaction between human CA3 and dentate subfields is difficult to investigate due to small size and proximity. We tested the hypothesis that human dentate gyrus is critical for pattern separation, whereas, CA3 underpins identical object recognition. Using 3 T MR hippocampal subfield volumetry combined with a behavioural pattern separation task, we demonstrate that dentate gyrus volume predicts accuracy and response time during behavioural pattern separation whereas CA3 predicts performance in object recognition memory. Critically, human dentate gyrus volume decreases with age whereas CA3 volume is age-independent. Further, decreased dentate gyrus volume, and no other subfield volume, mediates adverse effects of aging on memory. Thus, we demonstrate distinct roles for CA3 and dentate gyrus in human memory and uncover the variegated effects of human ageing across hippocampal regions. Accurate pinpointing of focal memory-related deficits will allow future targeted treatment for memory loss.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCA3 Region, HippocampalCase-Control StudiesCognitive DysfunctionDentate GyrusFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMiddle AgedReaction TimeRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID29070813
PMCPMC5656671
OpenAlexW2766932545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.