Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070726›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

The genomics of recovery from coral bleaching.

Luke Thomas, Stephen R Palumbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Divergent bleaching and recovery trajectories in reef-building corals following a decade of successive marine heatwaves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolomic signatures of coral bleaching history.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The genomics of recovery from coral bleaching.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luke ThomasDepartment of Biology, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA luke.thomas@live.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1095-9170
Stephen R PalumbiDepartment of Biology, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological damage from periodic environmental extremes is often repaired in resilient ecosystems, but the rate of return to a non-damaged state is critical. Measures of recovery of communities include biomass, productivity and diversity, while measures of recovery of individuals tend to focus on physiological conditions and the return to normal metabolic functioning. Transcriptomics offers a window into the entire physiology of the organism under stress and can represent a holistic view of organismal recovery. In this study, we track the recovery of seven colonies of

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeAnimalsAnthozoaDinoflagellidaGenomicsSymbiosisTemperatureAcropora hyacinthuscoral bleachingrecoverytranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29070726
PMCPMC5666106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.