Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070608›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2018

Stem cells: Aging and transcriptional fingerprints.

Brice E Keyes, Elaine Fuchs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Novel roles for RNA binding proteins squid, hephaesteus, and Hrb27C in Drosophila oogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Enhanced autophagy inAutophagy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brice E KeyesCalico Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA brice@calicolabs.com.
Elaine FuchsRobin Chemers Neustein Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY fuchslb@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-5137
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Skin Stem Cells: Purification and CharacterizationR01AR050452 · NIAMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ELAINE FUCHS · 2004 to 2026
$8.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells are imbued with unique qualities. They have the capacity to propagate themselves through symmetric divisions and to divide asymmetrically to engender new cells that can progress to differentiate into tissue-specific, terminal cell types. Armed with these qualities, stem cells in adult tissues are tasked with replacing decaying cells and regenerating tissue after injury to maintain optimal tissue function. With increasing age, stem cell functional abilities decline, resulting in reduced organ function and delays in tissue repair. Here, we review the effect of aging in five well-studied adult murine stem cell populations and explore age-related declines in stem cell function and their consequences for stem cell self-renewal, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration. Finally, we examine transcriptional changes that have been documented in aged stem cell populations and discuss new questions and future directions that this collection of data has uncovered.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAgingAnimalsCell CycleCellular SenescenceDNA DamageHomeostasisMiceRegenerationTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID29070608
PMCPMC5748991
OpenAlexW2766158258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.