Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070074›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2017

Integrated care reform in urban China: a qualitative study on design, supporting environment and implementation.

Yi Qian, Zhiyuan Hou, Wei Wang, Donglan Zhang, Fei Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi QianDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, P.O.Box 250, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhiyuan HouDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, P.O.Box 250, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. zyhou@fudan.edu.cn.
Wei WangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, P.O.Box 250, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Donglan ZhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Fei YanDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, P.O.Box 250, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitiatives on integrated care between hospitals and community health centers (CHCs) have been introduced to transform the current fragmented health care delivery system into an integrated system in China. Up to date no research has analyzed in-depth the experiences of these initiatives based on perspectives from various stakeholders. This study analyzed the integrated care pilot in Hangzhou City by investigating stakeholders' perspectives on its design features and supporting environment, their acceptability of this pilot, and further identifying the enabling and constraining factors that may influence the implementation of the integrated care reform.

methodsThe qualitative study was carried out based on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 50 key informants who were involved in the policy-making process and implementation. Relevant policy documents were also collected for analysis.

resultsThe pilot in Hangzhou was established as a CHC-led delivery system based on cooperation agreement between CHCs and hospitals to deliver primary and specialty care together for patients with chronic diseases. An innovative learning-from-practice mentorship system between specialists and general practitioners was also introduced to solve the poor capacity of general practitioners. The design of the pilot, its governance and organizational structure and human resources were enabling factors, which facilitated the integrated care reform. However, the main constraining factors were a lack of an integrated payment mechanism from health insurance and a lack of tailored information system to ensure its sustainability.

conclusionsThe integrated care pilot in Hangzhou enabled CHCs to play as gate-keeper and care coordinator for the full continuum of services across the health care providers. The government put integrated care a priority, and constructed an efficient design, governance and organizational structure to enable its implementation. Health insurance should play a proactive role, and adopt a shared financial incentive system to support integrated care across providers in the future.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationChinaChronic DiseaseCommunity Health CentersDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Care ReformHumansInsurance, HealthMalePilot ProjectsPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchUrban Health ServicesChinaHealth care delivery systemIntegrated carePrimary health careQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID29070074
PMCPMC5657104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.