Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070067›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2017

Prescription of potentially inappropriate medications among older people with intellectual disability: a register study.

Anna Axmon, Magnus Sandberg, Gerd Ahlström, Patrik Midlöv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anticholinergics, executive function, and cognitive/behavioral changes in Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychotropic drugs intake in people aging with intellectual disability: Prevalence and predictors.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna AxmonOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden. anna.axmon@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-8337
Magnus SandbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden.
Gerd AhlströmDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden.
Patrik MidlövCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people have a greater disease burden and are more likely than younger to be prescribed medications. They are also more sensitive to adverse effects. With this in mind, a range of medications have been suggested inappropriate in this population. People with intellectual disability (ID) have a higher disease burden than the general population, putting them at even greater risk of prescription of such medications. The aim of this study was to describe prescription of potentially inappropriate medications among older people with ID in relation to prescriptions among their age peers in the general population.

methodsWe established an administrative cohort of people with ID (ID cohort; n = 7936), using a Swedish national register. A referent cohort from the general population (gPop) was matched one-to-one by sex and year of birth. Data regarding prescription of potentially inappropriate medications were collected from the Swedish prescribed drug register for the years 2006-2012.

resultsPeople with ID were more likely than the general population to be prescribed medications with anticholinergic effects, intermediate- or long-acting benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics at least once during the study period, and also had more number of years with prescription. Except for benzodiazepines, those in the ID cohort with at least one prescription had larger amounts prescribed than those in the gPop cohort. People in the ID cohort were less likely than the general population to be prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Among those with at least one prescription of NSAIDs, those in the ID cohort had prescriptions during fewer years and in lower amounts than those in the gPop cohort.

conclusionsAlthough prescription of potentially inappropriate medications overall is more common among people with ID than in the general population, the opposite pattern is found for medications for pain management. This may be a result of pain being under-recognized and under-treated in this population. Thus, there is a need for training as well as increased knowledge and awareness among care and health care professionals regarding signs of adverse effects and the need of continuous evaluation of treatment in this vulnerable group.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesCholinergic AntagonistsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedPhenothiazinesTramadolAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesCholinergic AntagonistsPhenothiazinespropiomazineTramadolAgedAnticholinergicsAntipsychoticsBenzodiazepinesMiddle-agedPropiomazineTramadol

Identifiers

PMID29070067
PMCPMC5657112
OpenAlexW2767142319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.