Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29070036›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2017

Comparing clinician descriptions of frailty and geriatric syndromes using electronic health records: a retrospective cohort study.

Laura J Anzaldi, Ashwini Davison, Cynthia M Boyd, Bruce Leff, Hadi Kharrazi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of natural language processing in detecting and predicting falls within the healthcare setting: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterizing Fall Circumstances in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed Methods Approach.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura J AnzaldiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ashwini DavisonDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Cynthia M BoydCenter for Transformative Geriatric Research, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bruce LeffCenter for Transformative Geriatric Research, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hadi KharraziCenter for Population Health IT, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. kharrazi@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric syndromes, including frailty, are common in older adults and associated with adverse outcomes. We compared patients described in clinical notes as "frail" to other older adults with respect to geriatric syndrome burden and healthcare utilization.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study on 18,341 Medicare Advantage enrollees aged 65+ (members of a large nonprofit medical group in Massachusetts), analyzing up to three years of administrative claims and structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data. We determined the presence of ten geriatric syndromes (falls, malnutrition, dementia, severe urinary control issues, absence of fecal control, visual impairment, walking difficulty, pressure ulcers, lack of social support, and weight loss) from claims and EHR data, and the presence of frailty descriptions in clinical notes with a pattern-matching natural language processing (NLP) algorithm.

resultsOf the 18,341 patients, we found that 2202 (12%) were described as "frail" in clinical notes. "Frail" patients were older (82.3 ± 6.8 vs 75.9 ± 5.9, p < .001) and had higher rates of healthcare utilization, including number of inpatient hospitalizations and emergency department visits, than the rest of the population (p < .001). "Frail" patients had on average 4.85 ± 1.72 of the ten geriatric syndromes studied, while non-frail patients had 2.35 ± 1.71 (p = .013). Falls, walking difficulty, malnutrition, weight loss, lack of social support and dementia were more highly correlated with frailty descriptions. The most common geriatric syndrome pattern among "frail" patients was a combination of walking difficulty, lack of social support, falls, and weight loss.

conclusionsPatients identified as "frail" by providers in clinical notes have higher rates of healthcare utilization and more geriatric syndromes than other patients. Certain geriatric syndromes were more highly correlated with descriptions of frailty than others.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentMobility LimitationNatural Language ProcessingSocial SupportWeight LossAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCost of IllnessFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareElectronic health recordsFrailtyGeriatric syndromesNatural language processingUnstructured data

Identifiers

PMID29070036
PMCPMC5657074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.