Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069595›Full record

ArticleCell reports2017

Cortical Interneurons Differentially Shape Frequency Tuning following Adaptation.

Ryan G Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N Geffen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microglia Modulate Information Processing in the Mouse Barrel Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Distinct Inhibitory Neurons Differently Shape Neuronal Codes for Sound Intensity in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell-type-specific enhancement of deviance detection by synaptic zinc in the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Developmental hearing loss-induced perceptual deficits are rescued by genetic restoration of cortical inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Concurrent Encoding of Sequence Predictability and Event-Evoked Prediction Error in Unfolding Auditory Patterns.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan G NatanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology: HNS and Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Winnie RaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology: HNS and Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maria N GeffenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology: HNS and Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: mgeffen@med.upenn.edu.

Funding

Circuit Mechanisms of Sound Processing and Detection in the Auditory PathwayR01DC014479 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2015 to 2024
$4.7M
Neuronal circuits supporting learning-driven changes in auditory perception.R01DC015527 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Maria Neimark Geffen · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN BEHAVIORAL/COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH017168 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KABLE, JOSEPH W · 1985 to 2018
$4.2M
The role of cortical interneurons in auditory processing and learningR03DC013660 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2013 to 2015
$480k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014479NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015527NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013660NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH017168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal stimulus selectivity is shaped by feedforward and recurrent excitatory-inhibitory interactions. In the auditory cortex (AC), parvalbumin- (PV) and somatostatin-positive (SOM) inhibitory interneurons differentially modulate frequency-dependent responses of excitatory neurons. Responsiveness of neurons in the AC to sound is also dependent on stimulus history. We found that the inhibitory effects of SOMs and PVs diverged as a function of adaptation to temporal repetition of tones. Prior to adaptation, suppressing either SOM or PV inhibition drove both increases and decreases in excitatory spiking activity. After adaptation, suppressing SOM activity caused predominantly disinhibitory effects, whereas suppressing PV activity still evoked bi-directional changes. SOM, but not PV-driven inhibition, dynamically modulated frequency tuning with adaptation. Unlike PV-driven inhibition, SOM-driven inhibition elicited gain-like increases in frequency tuning reflective of adaptation. Our findings suggest that distinct cortical interneurons differentially shape tuning to sensory stimuli across the neuronal receptive field, altering frequency selectivity of excitatory neurons during adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory CortexEvoked Potentials, AuditoryInterneuronsMaleMiceNeural InhibitionParvalbuminsSomatostatinParvalbuminsSomatostatinadaptationarchaerhodopsinauditory cortexauditory processingcortical processingfrequency tuninginhibitioninterneuronsoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID29069595
PMCPMC5830304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.