Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069482›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2018

Metals in fungal virulence.

Franziska Gerwien, Volha Skrahina, Lydia Kasper, Bernhard Hube, Sascha Brunke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nitroxoline exerts potent anti-Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. TheJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Determination of Potential Inhibitors againstCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deletion ofmSphere · 2025
    Article
  17. Cryptococcal nutrient acquisition and pathogenesis: dining on the host.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franziska GerwienDepartment Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Volha SkrahinaDepartment Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Lydia KasperDepartment Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Bernhard HubeDepartment Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Sascha BrunkeDepartment Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology- Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metals are essential for life, and they play a central role in the struggle between infecting microbes and their hosts. In fact, an important aspect of microbial pathogenesis is the 'nutritional immunity', in which metals are actively restricted (or, in an extended definition of the term, locally enriched) by the host to hinder microbial growth and virulence. Consequently, fungi have evolved often complex regulatory networks, uptake and detoxification systems for essential metals such as iron, zinc, copper, nickel and manganese. These systems often differ fundamentally from their bacterial counterparts, but even within the fungal pathogens we can find common and unique solutions to maintain metal homeostasis. Thus, we here compare the common and species-specific mechanisms used for different metals among different fungal species-focusing on important human pathogens such as Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus or Cryptococcus neoformans, but also looking at model fungi such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae or A. nidulans as well-studied examples for the underlying principles. These direct comparisons of our current knowledge reveal that we have a good understanding how model fungal pathogens take up iron or zinc, but that much is still to learn about other metals and specific adaptations of individual species-not the least to exploit this knowledge for new antifungal strategies.

Indexed as

VirulenceFungiHomeostasisMetalsMetalshost–pathogen interactionsmetal homeostasisnutritional immunitypathogenic fungiregulatory networkstransition metals

Identifiers

PMID29069482
PMCPMC5812535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.