Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069474›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2018

The Validity and Value of Self-reported Physical Activity and Accelerometry in People With Schizophrenia: A Population-Scale Study of the UK Biobank.

Joseph Firth, Brendon Stubbs, Davy Vancampfort, Felipe B Schuch, Simon Rosenbaum, Philip B Ward, Josh A Firth, Jerome Sarris, Alison R Yung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Poor Agreement between Responses to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Objective ActiGraphInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Joseph FirthNICM, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Brendon StubbsPhysiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Davy VancampfortDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Felipe B SchuchHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Simon RosenbaumBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.
Philip B WardSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Josh A FirthDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jerome SarrisNICM, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Alison R YungDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBBlack Dog Institute · AUKing's College London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Department of Health ICA-CL-2017-03-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous physical activity (PA) research in schizophrenia has relied largely upon self-report measures. However, the accuracy of this method is questionable. Obtaining accurate measurements, and determining what may influence PA levels in schizophrenia, is essential to understand physical inactivity in this population. This study examined differences in self-reported and objectively measured PA in people with schizophrenia and the general population using a large, population-based dataset from the UK Biobank. Methods: Baseline data from the UK Biobank (2007-2010) were analyzed; including 1078 people with schizophrenia (54.19 ± 8.39 years; 55% male) and 450549 without (56.44 ± 8.11; 46% male). We compared self-reported PA with objectively measured accelerometry data in schizophrenia and comparison samples. We also examined correlations between self-report and objective measures. Results: People with schizophrenia reported the same PA levels as those without, with no differences in low, moderate, or vigorous intensity activity. However, accelerometry data showed a large and statistically significant reduction of PA in schizophrenia; as people with schizophrenia, on average, engaged in less PA than 80% of the general population. Nonetheless, within the schizophrenia sample, total self-reported PA still held significant correlations with objective measures. Conclusions: People with schizophrenia are significantly less active than the general population. However, self-report measures in epidemiological studies fail to capture the reduced activity levels in schizophrenia. This also has implications for self-report measures of other lifestyle factors which may contribute toward the poor health outcomes observed in schizophrenia. Nonetheless, self-report measures may still be useful for identifying how active individuals with schizophrenia relative to other patients.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAdultDatabases, FactualExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniaSelf ReportUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29069474
PMCPMC6192495
OpenAlexW2757897661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.