Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069412›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2017

MEBS, a software platform to evaluate large (meta)genomic collections according to their metabolic machinery: unraveling the sulfur cycle.

Valerie De Anda, Icoquih Zapata-Peñasco, Augusto Cesar Poot-Hernandez, Luis E Eguiarte, Bruno Contreras-Moreira, Valeria Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerie De AndaDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 70-275, Coyoacán 04510, D.F., México.
Icoquih Zapata-PeñascoDirección de Investigación en Transformación de Hidrocarburos, Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lázaro Cárdenas, Norte 152, Col. San Bartolo Atepehuacan, 07730, México.
Augusto Cesar Poot-HernandezDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas Computacionales y Automatización. Sección de Ingeniería de Sistemas Computacionales. Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas. Circuito Escolar 3000, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 Ciudad de México.
Luis E EguiarteDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 70-275, Coyoacán 04510, D.F., México.
Bruno Contreras-MoreiraEstación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Avda. Montañana, 1005, Zaragoza 50059, Spain.
Valeria SouzaDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 70-275, Coyoacán 04510, D.F., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of metagenomic and genomic sequences has dramatically improved our understanding of microbial diversity, yet our ability to infer metabolic capabilities in such datasets remains challenging. We describe the Multigenomic Entropy Based Score pipeline (MEBS), a software platform designed to evaluate, compare, and infer complex metabolic pathways in large "omic" datasets, including entire biogeochemical cycles. MEBS is open source and available through https://github.com/eead-csic-compbio/metagenome_Pfam_score. To demonstrate its use, we modeled the sulfur cycle by exhaustively curating the molecular and ecological elements involved (compounds, genes, metabolic pathways, and microbial taxa). This information was reduced to a collection of 112 characteristic Pfam protein domains and a list of complete-sequenced sulfur genomes. Using the mathematical framework of relative entropy (H΄), we quantitatively measured the enrichment of these domains among sulfur genomes. The entropy of each domain was used both to build up a final score that indicates whether a (meta)genomic sample contains the metabolic machinery of interest and to propose marker domains in metagenomic sequences such as DsrC (PF04358). MEBS was benchmarked with a dataset of 2107 non-redundant microbial genomes from RefSeq and 935 metagenomes from MG-RAST. Its performance, reproducibility, and robustness were evaluated using several approaches, including random sampling, linear regression models, receiver operator characteristic plots, and the area under the curve metric (AUC). Our results support the broad applicability of this algorithm to accurately classify (AUC = 0.985) hard-to-culture genomes (e.g., Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator), previously characterized ones, and metagenomic environments such as hydrothermal vents, or deep-sea sediment. Our benchmark indicates that an entropy-based score can capture the metabolic machinery of interest and can be used to efficiently classify large genomic and metagenomic datasets, including uncultivated/unexplored taxa.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeSoftwareAnimalsHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSequence Analysis, DNASulfurSulfurmetabolic machinerymetagenomicsmultigenomic entropy-based scoreomic-datasetsPfam domainsrelative entropysulfur cycle

Identifiers

PMID29069412
PMCPMC5737871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.