ArticleFamily practice2018
Contextual levers for team-based primary care: lessons from reform interventions in five jurisdictions in three countries.
Article in Family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- General practice staff and patient experiences of a multicomponent intervention for people at high risk of poor health outcomes: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Trial
- Examining Interprofessional teams structures and processes in the implementation of a primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY) for older adults using normalization process theory.BMC family practice · 2020Trial
- The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research.BMC primary care · 2024Review
- The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.BMC primary care · 2023Review
- "I don't see the whole picture of their health": a critical ethnography of constraints to interprofessional collaboration in end-of-life conversations in primary care.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Multifaceted intervention to increase the delivery of alcohol brief interventions in primary care: a mixed-methods process analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Article
- Identifying key policy objectives for strong primary care: a cross-sectional study.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- Scoping review to identify strategies and interventions improving interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care.BMJ open · 2022Article
- A Novel Mixed Methods Approach Combining Geospatial Mapping and Qualitative Inquiry to Identify Multilevel Policy Targets: The Focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP) Applied to Cancer Survivorship.Journal of mixed methods research · 2022Article
- Patients' perceptions of frequent hospital admissions: a qualitative interview study with older people above 65 years of age.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Uncovering the wisdom hidden between the lines: the Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach.Family practice · 2018Article
- Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice.Journal of integrated care (Brighton, England) · 2018Article
- National Health Policy Reform for Primary Care in Chile: A Qualitative Analysis of the Health Program Documents.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Most Western nations have sought primary care (PC) reform due to the rising costs of health care and the need to manage long-term health conditions. A common reform-the introduction of inter-professional teams into traditional PC settings-has been difficult to implement despite financial investment and enthusiasm. Objective: To synthesize findings across five jurisdictions in three countries to identify common contextual factors influencing the successful implementation of teamwork within PC practices. Methods: An international consortium of researchers met via teleconference and regular face-to-face meetings using a Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach to re-analyse and synthesize their published and unpublished data and their own work experience. Studies were evaluated through reflection and facilitated discussion to identify factors associated with successful teamwork implementation. Matrices were used to summarize interpretations from the studies. Results: Seven common levers influence a jurisdiction's ability to implement PC teams. Team-based PC was promoted when funding extended beyond fee-for-service, where care delivery did not require direct physician involvement and where governance was inclusive of non-physician disciplines. Other external drivers included: the health professional organizations' attitude towards team-oriented PC, the degree of external accountability required of practices, and the extent of their links with the community and medical neighbourhood. Programs involving outreach facilitation, leadership training and financial support for team activities had some effect. Conclusion: The combination of physician dominance and physician aligned fee-for-service payment structures provide a profound barrier to implement team-oriented PC. Policy makers should carefully consider the influence of these and our other identified drivers when implementing team-oriented PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.