Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069371›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Alters how Specific Attributes are Weighed in Subjective Valuation.

Avinash R Vaidya, Marcus Sefranek, Lesley K Fellows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Orbitofrontal High-Gamma Reflects Spike-Dissociable Value and Decision Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Disentangling the Component Processes in Complex Planning Impairments Following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The hierarchical construction of value.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Responses to Heartbeats in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Contribute to Subjective Preference-Based Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. A Preferential Role for Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Assessing "the Value of the Whole" in Multiattribute Object Evaluation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avinash R VaidyaMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marcus SefranekMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lesley K FellowsMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP 97821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of subjective value is central to current neurobiological views of economic decision-making. Much of this work has focused on signals in the ventromedial frontal lobe (VMF) that correlate with the subjective value of a variety of stimuli (e.g., food, monetary gambles), and are thought to support decision-making. However, the neural processes involved in assessing and integrating value information from the attributes of such complex options remain to be defined. Here, we tested the necessary role of VMF in weighting attributes of naturalistic stimuli during value judgments. We asked how distinct attributes of visual artworks influenced the subjective value ratings of subjects with VMF damage, compared to healthy participants and a frontal lobe damaged control group. Subjects with VMF damage were less influenced by the energy (emotion, complexity) and color radiance (warmth, saturation) of the artwork, while they were similar to control groups in considering saliency, balance and concreteness. These dissociations argue that VMF is critical for allowing certain affective content to influence subjective value, while sparing the influence of perceptual or representational information. These distinctions are important for better defining the often-underspecified concept of subjective value and developing more detailed models of the brain mechanisms underlying decision behavior.

Indexed as

ArtDecision MakingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansJudgmentMaleMiddle AgedSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID29069371
PMCPMC6188550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.