Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069324›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Activity in LIP, But not V4, Matches Performance When Attention is Spread.

Fabrice Arcizet, Koorosh Mirpour, Daniel J Foster, James W Bisley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The neural instantiation of a priority map.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
  4. Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabrice ArcizetDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Koorosh MirpourDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel J FosterDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James W BisleyDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Guidance of Visual AttentionR01EY019273 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BISLEY, JAMES · 2008 to 2017
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enhancement of neuronal responses in many visual areas while animals perform spatial attention tasks has widely been thought to be the neural correlate of visual attention, but it is unclear whether the presence or absence of this modulation contributes to our striking inability to notice changes in change blindness examples. We asked whether neuronal responses in visual area V4 and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) in posterior parietal cortex could explain the limited ability of subjects to attend multiple items in a display. We trained animals to perform a change detection task in which they had to compare 2 arrays of stimuli separated briefly in time and found that each animal's performance decreased as function of set-size. Neuronal discriminability in V4 was consistent across set-sizes, but decreased for higher set-sizes in LIP. The introduction of a reward bias produced attentional enhancement in V4, but this could not explain the vast improvement in performance, whereas the enhancement in LIP responses could. We suggest that behavioral set-size effects and the marked improvement in performance with focused attention may not be related to response enhancement in V4 but, instead, may occur in or on the way to LIP.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsAttentionMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID29069324
PMCPMC6215472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.