Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29069107›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists2017

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: Signal detection and validation.

Sarah A Mossman, Marissa J Luft, Heidi K Schroeder, Sara T Varney, David E Fleck, Drew H Barzman, Richard Gilman, Melissa P DelBello, Jeffrey R Strawn

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07189715 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study on AI-Based Imagery Rescripting for Childhood Criticism Memories

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawRan2025 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety, Fear of Failure, RuminationArmsImagery Rescripting Intervention (AI-Generated)
NCT07565714 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Optimization of Late Imagery Rescripting Research Using Generative Artificial Intelligence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety, Fear of Failure, RuminationArmsImagery Rescripting Intervention
NCT07699159 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cohort Network for Adolescents and Youth With multipLe Mental Health Conditions (CALM): A Master Observational Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2025 to 2028Enrolled1,620ConditionsMultiple Mental Health Conditions, Child Mental Health, Youth Mental Health
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 379 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations Between Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Dimensions and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptomatology.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A Mossman
Marissa J Luft
Heidi K Schroeder
Sara T Varney
David E Fleck
Drew H Barzman
Richard Gilman
Melissa P DelBello
Jeffrey R StrawnDepartment of Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. E-mail: strawnjr@uc.edu.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Neurofunctional Predictors of Treatment Response in Adolescents with GADK23MH106037 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2014 to 2017
$745k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH106037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pediatric patients with anxiety disorders, existing symptom inventories are either not freely available or require extensive time and effort to administer. We sought to evaluate a brief self-report scale-the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)-in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

methodsThe Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) and the GAD-7 were administered to youth with GAD (confirmed by structured interview). Relationships between the measures were assessed, and sensitivity and specificity was determined with regard to a global symptom severity measure (Clinical Global Impression-Severity).

resultsIn adolescents with GAD (N = 40; mean age, 14.8 ± 2.8), PARS and GAD-7 scores strongly correlated (R = 0.65, P ≤ .001) and a main effect for symptom severity was observed (P ≤ .001). GAD-7 scores ≥11 and ≥17 represented the optimum specificity and sensitivity for detecting moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.

conclusionsThe PARS and GAD-7 similarly reflect symptom severity. The GAD-7 is associated with acceptable specificity and sensitivity for detecting clinically significant anxiety symptoms. GAD-7 scores may be used to assess anxiety symptoms and to differentiate between mild and moderate GAD in adolescents, and may be more efficient than the PARS.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf ReportAdolescentAnxiety DisordersFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29069107
PMCPMC5765270
OpenAlexW2899744143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.