SynthesisMedicine2017
Survival and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery: A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade gliomas.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- CyberKnife for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Trial
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for first-time treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective single-center study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- A mouse model of stereotactic radiosurgery-induced neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier compromise.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Breast Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- The Benefits and Challenges of the Multimodal Treatment in Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The use of stereotactic MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for the treatment of pediatric cavernous malformations: the SUNY Upstate Golisano Children's Hospital experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Assessment of therapeutic outcome and role of reirradiation in patients with radiation-induced glioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience.Cureus · 2021Article
- Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients: Data from the Czech TULUNG Registry.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Therapeutic Update on Huntington's Disease: Symptomatic Treatments and Emerging Disease-Modifying Therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020Review
- Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant gliomas: comparison with single session stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: Incidence, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Opportunities.Current oncology reports · 2019Review
- Combined intracavitary thermotherapy with iron oxide nanoparticles and radiotherapy as local treatment modality in recurrent glioblastoma patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUtilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) has been slowly increasing with variable reported success rates.
objectiveSystematic review of the available data to evaluate the efficacy of SRS as a treatment for HGG with regards to median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in addition to ascertaining the rate of radiation necrosis and other SRS-related major neurological complications.
methodsLiterature searches were performed for publications from 1992 to 2016. The pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were calculated as a weighted estimate of population medians. Meta-analyses of published rates of radiation necrosis and other major neurological complications were also performed.
resultsTwenty-nine studies reported the use of SRS for recurrent HGG, and 16 studies reported the use of SRS for newly diagnosed HGG. For recurrent HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 5.42 months (3-16 months) and 20.19 months (9-65 months), respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 5.9% (0-44%); and the pooled estimates of major neurological complications rate was 3.3% (0-23%). For newly diagnosed HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 7.89 months (5.5-11 months) and 16.87 months (9.5-33 months) respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 6.5% (0-33%); and the pooled estimates of other major neurological complications rate was 1.5% (0-25%).
conclusionOur results suggest that SRS holds promise as a relatively safe treatment option for HGG. In terms of efficacy at this time, there are inadequate data to support routine utilization of SRS as the standard of care for newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG. Further studies should be pursued to define more clearly the therapeutic role of SRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.