ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2018
Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity.
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing recommendations on ethical aspects affecting studies in health professions education research.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Building capacity in translational research ethics among early-stage investigators: A pilot course on the ethics of the clinician-researcher dual-role.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Evaluating and supporting leadership, management, and mentoring: a framework for catalyzing responsible research and healthy research environments.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Review
- Data Hazards as An Ethical Toolkit for Neuroscience.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- Public health and research ethics education: the experience of developing a new cadre of bioethicists at a Ugandan institution.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.Accountability in research · 2023Article
- A randomized implementation trial to increase adoption of evidence-informed consent practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Reproducibility in the Social Sciences.Annual review of sociology · 2022Article
- Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.Accountability in research · 2022Article
- How to Conduct Responsible Research: A Guide for Graduate Students.Current protocols · 2021Article
- Perceived barriers to assessing understanding and appreciation of informed consent in clinical trials: A mixed-method study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Leading the people and leading the work: Practical considerations for ethical research.Translational issues in psychological science · 2020Article
- What Explains Associations of Researchers' Nation of Origin and Scores on a Measure of Professional Decision-Making? Exploring Key Variables and Interpretation of Scores.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Leading for research excellence and integrity: A qualitative investigation of the relationship-building practices of exemplary principal investigators.Accountability in research · 2019Article
- Article
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHREArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The authors explore five dimensions of research ethics: (1) normative ethics, which includes meta-ethical questions; (2) compliance with regulations, statutes, and institutional policies; (3) the rigor and reproducibility of science; (4) social value; and (5) workplace relationships. Each of the five dimensions is important not only because it addresses an aspect of good research done in a good manner but also because it addresses the concerns of key stakeholders in the research enterprise. The five-dimension framework can guide institutions as they answer three questions central to any research ethics program: (1) Who should champion research ethics? (2) What should interventions look like? and (3) Who should participate in the interventions? The framework is valuable because the answers to these three questions are radically different depending on the dimension under consideration. An expanded vision of research ethics does not entail that institutions should require additional online training or approvals from institutional review boards. However, without acknowledging all five dimensions, programs risk missing an important aspect of research ethics or ignoring the interests of important stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.