Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29068153›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2018

Reduction of groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT): a prospective, randomised, single-institution study.

Sebastian P Pleger, Nadine Nink, Meshal Elzien, Alexander Kunold, Ahmed Koshty, Andreas Böning

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05434182 (Groin Surgical Site Infection Incidence in Vascular Surgery With Intradermal Suture Versus Metallic Stapling Skin Closure), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05434182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Groin Surgical Site Infection Incidence in Vascular Surgery With Intradermal Suture Versus Metallic Stapling Skin Closure: A Pragmatic Open-Label Parallel-Group Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled225ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsIntradermal Suture, Metallic Staples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Postoperative outcomes of ligasure use during common femoral artery exposure.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Meta-analysis of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean section surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Traditional Dressing: An Italian Health Technology Assessment Evaluation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian P PlegerDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jung-Stilling Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Nadine NinkDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jung-Stilling Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Meshal ElzienDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jung-Stilling Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Alexander KunoldDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jung-Stilling Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Ahmed KoshtyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jung-Stilling Hospital, Siegen, Germany.
Andreas BöningDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Diakonie Klinikum Jung-Stilling · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groin wound infections in patients undergoing vascular procedures often cause a lengthy process of wound healing. Several clinical studies and case reports show a reduction of surgical site infections (SSIs) in various wound types after using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). The aim of this prospective, randomised, single-institution study was to investigate the effectiveness of ciNPT (PREVENA™ Therapy) compared to conventional therapy on groin incisions after vascular surgery. From 1 February to 30 October 2015, 100 patients with 129 groin incisions were analysed. Patients were randomised and treated with either ciNPT (n = 58 groins) or the control dressing (n = 71 groins). ciNPT was applied intraoperatively and removed on days 5-7 postoperatively. The control group received a conventional adhesive plaster. Wound evaluation based on the Szilagyi classification took place postoperatively on days 5-7 and 30. Compared to the control group, the ciNPT group showed a significant reduction in wound complications (P < 0·0005) after both wound evaluation periods and in revision surgeries (P = 0·022) until 30 days postoperatively. Subgroup analysis revealed that ciNPT had a significant effect on almost all examined risk factors for wound healing. ciNPT significantly reduced the incidence of incision complications and revision procedures after vascular surgery.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyProspective StudiesReoperationRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionVascular Surgical ProceduresWound Healingclosed incision negative pressure therapysurgical site infectionsvascular surgerywound healing

Identifiers

PMID29068153
PMCPMC7950196
OpenAlexW2765473001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.