ArticleThoracic cancer2018
Detection of circulating tumor cells using oHSV1-hTERT-GFP in lung cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving PD-(L)1 blockade and targeted therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Liquid Biopsy in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Prognostic and therapeutic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with lung cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020Review
- Prospective Exploratory Study of the Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Exposed to Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Circulating tumor cells in the pulmonary vein increase significantly after lobectomy: A prospective observational study.Thoracic cancer · 2019Observational
- [Progress of Liquid Biopsy in Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was conducted to evaluate the clinical utility of the oHSV1-hTERT-GFP circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection method in the peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer by comparing its sensitivity to the CellSearch CTC detection method.
methodsThe oHSV1-hTERT-GFP and CellSearch CTC detection methods were compared using peripheral blood samples of patients pathologically diagnosed with lung cancer.
resultsA total of 240 patients with lung cancer were recruited, including 89 patients who were newly diagnosed and 151 patients who had previously received treatment. Sixty-six newly diagnosed patients were evaluated using both methods. The CTC detection rates were 71.2% and 33.3% using the oHSV1-hTERT-GFP and CellSearch methods, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Among the entire cohort (n = 240), the CTC detection rate using the oHSV1-hTERT-GFP method was 76.3%, with a CTC count of 0-81. The CTC detection rates were 76.7%, 68.9%, and 76.3% in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small cell lung cancer, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the CTC detection rates between these different pathological subtypes (P = 0.738). The CTC detection rates of 79.8% and 74.4% in patients with stage I-III and IV lung cancer, respectively, were not significantly different (P = 0.427).
conclusionThe oHSV1-hTERT-GFP method is highly effective for detecting CTCs in patients with lung cancer, independent of pathological type and disease stage, and is ideal for large-scale clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.