Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29067634›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2017

Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Josefin Segelman, Jonas Nygren

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integration of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing pituitary surgery.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Critically ill patients with cancer: A clinical perspective.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josefin SegelmanDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. josefin.segelman@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7738-9806
Jonas NygrenDepartment of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Box 4622, 116 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within traditional clinical care, the postoperative recovery after pelvic/rectal surgery has been slow with high morbidity and long hospital stay. The enhanced recovery after surgery program is a multimodal approach to perioperative care designed to accelerate recovery and safely reduce hospital stay. This review will briefly summarize optimal perioperative care, before, during and after surgery in this group of patients and issues related to implementation and audit.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicElective Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayPelvisPerioperative CareRectumERASPelvic surgeryPerioperative careRectal surgery

Identifiers

PMID29067634
PMCPMC5686231
OpenAlexW2766944830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.