ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018
Using a Novel In Vitro Fontan Model and Condition-Specific Real-Time MRI Data to Examine Hemodynamic Effects of Respiration and Exercise.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Trial
- Initial clinical validation of a hybridFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- The Influence of Respiration on Blood Flow in the Fontan Circulation: Insights for Imaging-Based Clinical Evaluation of the Total Cavopulmonary Connection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Impact of Free-Breathing Phase-Contrast MRI on Decision-Making in Fontan Surgical Planning.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020Article
- Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
- Respiration Dependency of Caval Blood Flow in Patients with Fontan Circulation: Quantification Using 5D Flow MRI.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2019Article
- The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies exist modeling the Fontan connection to understand its hemodynamic ties to patient outcomes (Chopski in: Experimental and Computational Assessment of Mechanical Circulatory Assistance of a Patient-Specific Fontan Vessel Configuration. Dissertation, 2013; Khiabani et al. in J Biomech 45:2376-2381, 2012; Taylor and Figueroa in Annu Rev Biomed 11:109-134, 2009; Vukicevic et al. in ASAIO J 59:253-260, 2013). The most patient-accurate of these studies include flexible, patient-specific total cavopulmonary connections. This study improves Fontan hemodynamic modeling by validating Fontan model flexibility against a patient-specific bulk compliance value, and employing real-time phase contrast magnetic resonance flow data. The improved model was employed to acquire velocity field information under breath-held, free-breathing, and exercise conditions to investigate the effect of these conditions on clinically important Fontan hemodynamic metrics including power loss and viscous dissipation rate. The velocity data, obtained by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry, was visualized for qualitative three-dimensional flow field comparisons between the conditions. Key hemodynamic metrics were calculated from the velocity data and used to quantitatively compare the flow conditions. The data shows a multi-factorial and extremely patient-specific nature to Fontan hemodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.