Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29067491›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2018

Impact of malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein on coronary plaque vulnerability in patients not receiving lipid-lowering therapy: a whole coronary analysis with multislice-computed tomography.

Tsuyoshi Ito, Taku Ichihashi, Hiroshi Fujita, Tomonori Sugiura, Nobuyuki Ohte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Implications ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsuyoshi ItoDepartment of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Nagoya, 4678601, Japan. tuyosiito@gmail.com.
Taku IchihashiDepartment of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Nagoya, 4678601, Japan.
Hiroshi FujitaDepartment of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Nagoya, 4678601, Japan.
Tomonori SugiuraDepartment of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Nagoya, 4678601, Japan.
Nobuyuki OhteDepartment of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Nagoya, 4678601, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulnerable plaque disruption was suggested as a primary cause of acute coronary syndrome. This study investigated the impact of malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) on whole coronary plaque vulnerability, based on multislice-computed tomography (MSCT). We included 197 patients that were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. We retrospectively analyzed MSCT and MDA-LDL measurements. We defined a CT-derived vulnerable plaque as a plaque with a remodeling index > 1.10 and a mean CT density value < 30 HU. Vulnerable plaques were detected in 60 patients (30%). Patients with vulnerable plaques had significantly higher MDA-LDL levels than patients without vulnerable plaques (151.3 ± 42.3 vs. 118.5 ± 41.7 U/L, p < 0.01). A univariate regression analysis showed that vulnerable plaques were significantly related to MDA-LDL levels [10 U/L groups, odds ratio (OR): 1.19; p < 0.01] and in a multivariate model (10 U/L groups, OR: 1.18; p < 0.01). Patients with multivessel vulnerable plaques had significantly higher MDA-LDL levels than those with single-vessel involvement or no vulnerable plaque (172.4 ± 28.5 vs. 142.8 ± 44.2 vs. 118.5 ± 41.7 U/L, respectively; p < 0.01). MDA-LDL difference was observed for all LDL tertiles (bottom; 128.9 ± 41.1 vs. 97.3 ± 25.0 U/L, p < 0.01, middle; 142.6 ± 42.7 vs. 122.5 ± 35.1 U/L, p = 0.05, top; 166.0 ± 38.1 vs. 143.5 ± 51.6 U/L, p = 0.05). Increased MDA-LDL levels were associated with the presence and extent of vulnerable plaques, regardless of LDL levels.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLipoproteins, LDLMaleMalondialdehydeMultidetector Computed TomographyPlaque, AtheroscleroticRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersLipoproteins, LDLMalondialdehydemalondialdehyde-low density lipoprotein, humanComputed tomography coronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseMalondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoproteinVulnerable plaque

Identifiers

PMID29067491
OpenAlexW2766533644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.